
|

|

Please Note!
The following Q&A is based on questions asked during the "Food Plastic Packaging Regulations: How to Easily Comply with EU Directive 2002/72/EC" webseminar held by Dr. Rossi.
The answers of Dr. Luigi Rossi should be considered as the "personal" point of view of the author and not as an official answer of the European Commission or a legal interpretation of the legislation, which is exclusive duty of the Court of Justice.
 |
Who has to comply?
If we are producer of masterbatches and compounding, in which part of the chain are we and how affected are we by the EU regulations?
Can you please clarify the responsibilities of masterbatch producers on providing migration documentation? Do they need only have information from their suppliers or do they need to have migration data on the ingredients in the masterbatch?
Can you please clarify if the manufacturer of resin is required to test for SML, QM, etc or is that the sole responsibility of the converter?
How will articles being imported from outside the EU be controlled for compliance?
In a multilayer, concerning the layer which does not come in direct contact with foodstuff, is a SML test necessary for such a layer?
For active packaging, more specific for oxygen scavenger systems, do we need to prove that all migrants (degradation products, reaction products, and so on) fall within the scope of the 2002/72/EC Directive?
Do printed materials have to be tested for migration?
|
 |
 |
Declaration of Conformity (DoC) and Supporting Documentation (SD)
As a manufacturer of plastics do we have the obligation to bring the DoC to our customers or do we need to provide the DoCs on request in order to enable our customers to check compliance?
The DoC for a supplier ingredient based on a safety risk assessment if the ingredient is not in the EU positive list of additive is a self-declaration and does not need to be public. Can that be used as confidentiality tools (comparable to FCN from FDA)? Is there a requirement to have this risk assessment be verified by an authority?
When the raw material is a mixture how do you deal with DoC?
Will safety assessments using FDA consumption/food type factors be accepted for SD?
What shall count as the date where compliance is compulsory: packaging date of foodstuff or production date of packaging material?
|
 |
 |
Regulations and Directives
Is the risk assessment similar to what the REACH programme is requiring?
Is there a plan to harmonise the FDA migrations testing with the EU ones?
What are the plans of the EU regulatory bodies to enforce compliance and ensure a level playing field for all?
Where to get information about the timeframe of the legislation process?
If a plastic meets the US FDA standards, will that material meet this standard?
|
 |
 |
How to perform tests?
We manufacture hundreds of different products for food packaging. To test every combination is of course unaffordable - what is an appropriate sampling plan under this scenario?
What are the different simulants used for migration tests in regards to dry food contact application?
How is packaging intended to be used for -cooking, boiling, oven, microwave- tested?
|
 |
 |
Miscellaneous
Could you remind the difference between ingredients and resin? The resin is made from ingredients? Is it related to the upstream of the resin supplier?
About the Functional barrier concept, is it true that an unauthorized substance can be in the material as long as it can be stopped by the barrier and how to be sure that SML stays under?
If an additive or material is not already covered by mathematical modelling (e.g. MigraPass), is there a way that it can be added?
How do you get a pigment added to a positive list?
If an additive or material is not already covered by mathematical modelling (e.g. MigraPass), is there a way that it can be added?
|
 |
 |
About MigraPass™
What is the Mathematical Model applied in MigraPass™?
Is MigraPass™ approved by the EU?
How many packaging layers can be simulated with MigraPass™?
What are the standard (migration testing) conditions recommended by EU?
|
 |
Who has to comply?
 |
Can you please clarify the responsibilities of masterbatch producers on providing migration documentation? Do they need only have information from their suppliers or do they need to have migration data on the ingredients in the masterbatch? |
|
Masterbatch is a mixture where a high concentration of pigment and/or additives are dispersed in a carrier medium which can then be used directly by the processor in small quantities to pigment or modify the virgin polymer material. Therefore the masterbatch producer shall be assimilated to an “Ingredient supplier”.
His responsibilities are mentioned in slides 32 and 36 of the presentation "Food Plastic Packaging Regulations: How to Easily Comply with EU Directive 2002/72/EC". He can rely on his supplier' documents unless there are chemical reactions between the various components. If this is the case he should perform some tests. Of course the masterbatch producer can obtain the needed information on the individual pigment/additive from the substances suppliers to perform tests . In principle, he should give an indication of the concentration of the additives in the masterbatch or a dilution factor of the masterbatch in the final plastic. The problem of the confidentiality of data should be taken into account (see also question N° 2 of the DoC(s) & Supporting Documents part and the answer) |
 |
 |
Can you please clarify if the manufacturer of resin is required to test for SML, QM, etc or is that the sole responsibility of the converter? |
|
The chain in the manufacture of a plastic may be complex and we have to simplify.
It is difficult for the resin manufacturers to carry out migration testing as they do not prepare the final plastic and, therefore, the data on the level of monomers released by a resin often can not ensure the compliance with legislation.
In principle is the food packer that should carry out the migration testing as he is the only person who knows the packaging, the foodstuffs in contact and the conditions of such contact. Of course this is quite theoretical as often the declaration of conformity (DoC) in the hand of the food packer or available to him is that released by the converter.
However the converter not necessarily knows the conditions of use of his finished plastic i.e. food in contact, t, T. Therefore generally the testing carried out by the converters may not be based on the analysis of food in worst contact conditions. The converter often uses the conventional testing scheme i.e. food simulants and standardised conditions of use – t, T, S/V and can only certify that under such conditions the plastic is in compliance with the OML and, if appropriate, the SML. But if the food packer will use for instance different S/V ratio, the compliance can not longer be respected. In conclusion it is highly recommended that good co-ordination is always established between the various business operators to ensure in the real conditions of use the compliance of a finished plastic with the law.
A plastic shall be always in compliance with Overall Migration Limit (and then a testing is necessary). If the plastic contains a substance for which an SML appears in the Regulation, the compliance with the SML shall be verified by applying the appropriate tests or the modelling or the other described rules (see slides 23-27 of the presentation "Food Plastic Packaging Regulations: How to Easily Comply with EU Directive 2002/72/EC" ). |
 |
 |
For active packaging, more specific for oxygen scavenger systems, do we need to prove that all migrants (degradation products, reaction products, and so on) fall within the scope of the 2002/72/EC Directive? |
|
At this moment the plastic material should be in compliance with 2002/72. Additives and monomers shall be authorised for food contact plastics and their reaction and degradation products shall not pose a risk to human health. The Framework Regulation 1935/2004 states in Article 4 (2) that substances deliberately incorporated in the material to be released shall be authorised. In an oxygen scavenger (an absorber) you usually do not intend the release of the incorporated substance. An authorisation is therefore not necessary.
In the future oxygene scavengers may be covered by a specific Regulation on active packaging. I insert below the relevant article which appear in the version of the draft proposal of Regulation dated (20.10.2004) which may be adopted (it depends by the Member States of the EU….) on 2006.
Article 3
Requirements for A&I materials
A&I materials shall only be placed on the market and put into contact with foodstuffs if:
(a) they comply with the requirements established by the (new Framework) Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 and by Directive 2002/72 the applicable implementing measures referred to in Article 5 of that Regulation. In absence of a Community implementing measure, national legislation applies;
In the application of articles 3(1)(b) and 4.1 of (new Framework) Regulation, in the case of an active releasing material, when an overall migration limit is established in a specific Community measure or, in the absence of a Community provision, in a national law, the amount of the released active substance(s) shall not be included in the value of the measured migration. Moreover, the concentration of the active substance in the food, originating from any source, shall comply with the relevant Community restriction applicable to [processed] food, or in the absence, with national provision;
(b) they are suitable and effective for the intended purpose of use;
(c) the A&I components incorporated in them are authorised in accordance with the requirements of Article 4.
Article 4
No person shall place on the market an A&I material unless the A&I components are covered by an authorisation granted in accordance with the new Framework Regulation. The A&I components shall satisfy the conditions of use provided by the authorisation.
In this case the use of the term « substance » is justified as it is not intended to substract the all « released active component » but only the « released active substance(s) » present in the system |
 |
Declaration of Conformity (DoC) and Supporting Documentation (SD)
Regulations and Directives
 |
Is the risk assessment similar to what the REACH programme is requiring? |
REACH deals with chemicals which are traded independently of their final usage. Therefore a certain number of the tests are required in accordance with the level of use. Moreover the evaluation deals not only with human health (toxicology), but also for the environment (eco-toxicology).
A chemical in food contact is evaluated in accordance to his migration level. Therefore the toxicological testing is not necessarily the same. For instance, if you carried out 2 mutagenicity tests for REACH and you want to use the same substance as an additive for food plastics, you should provide a third mutagenicity test in the technical dossier for an authorisation at EU level.
|
 |
 |
Where to get information about the timeframe of the legislation process? |
The adoption of EU legislation depends on the consensus of all the stakeholders. Our plans are the following: 3rd amendment of 2002/72, adoption in 2005. Regulation on active and intelligent packaging and on recycled plastics in 2006. No timeframe yet for Super-Regulation, but adoption likely also in 2006. |
 |
How to perform tests?
Miscellaneous
About MigraPass™
 |
What is the Mathematical Model applied in MigraPass™ |
|
MigraPass™ is a mathematical model based on the well established model of FABES, MIGRATEST © Lite 2001.
The mathematical model used in the software MIGRATEST © Lite describes a one-dimensional migration process from a finite homogenous plane plastic sample of constant thickness into a well-mixed liquid food or food simulant of finite volume.
The differential equation - also known as Fick's 2 nd diffusion equation - describes this migration process. With initial and boundary conditions, this equation can be solved analytically and the amount of migrant found in the foodstuff at the end of the migration period can be calculated.
Another Fick equation can be rearranged to give an equation which can be used to estimate the Maximum Initial Concentration of migrant ( MIC ) in the food contact material or article.
These equations are used in the software MIGRATEST © Lite to estimate both the amount of migrant released in a timeframe from a plastic food contact material into a certain food simulant as well as the MIC corresponding in a given application to a SML. |
 |
 |
Is MigraPass™ approved by the EU? |
|
 The European Commissions supported recently an international group of experts, coordinated by the FABES GmbH, from Munich, Germany and CEFIC/FCA, from Brussels, Belgium, to demonstrate that the theoretical estimation of migration processes can be regarded as a valid and reliable method to calculate “worst-case” migration rates from the most important food contact plastics into the EU official food simulants. The result of this contract was published in:
K. Hinrichs and O. Piringer (editors), 2002, “Evaluation of migration models to used under Directive 90/128/EEC”, Final report to SMT4-CT98-7513 contract, European Commission, Directorate General for Research, Report-EUR 20604EN, Brussels.
The evidence demonstrated by this Contract was sanctioned by the European Commission who recently passed the theoretical migration estimation as a conformity and quality assurance instrument in the framework of the:
EU Plastics Directive 2002/72/EC, Article 8, § 4:
The verification of compliance with the specific migration limits provided for in §1 may be ensured by the determination of the quantity of a substance in the finished material or article, provided that a relationship between that quantity and the value of the specific migration of the substance has been established either by an adequate experimentation or by the application of generally recognised diffusion models based on scientific evidence. To demonstrate the non-compliance of a material or article, confirmation of the estimated migration value by experimental testing is obligatory.
The mathematical model and algorithms used to be used for this purpose are given in the:
Practical Guide for Users of EU-Directives, 2004, in “Food Contact Materials”,
EU-Commission SANCO-DGIII/LR
MigraPass™, based on the software MIGRATEST © Lite developed by FABES GmbH, from Munich, Germany, works with the very same mathematical models and algorithms as the ones given in this Practical Guide. Here is an abstract of the Practical Guide concerning
migration modelling software:
For conveniency reasons, it should be noted that a specifically tailored and user friendly computer program is available on the market (MIGRATEST Lite 2001, FABES GmbH Munich , Germany )
Moreover MigraPass™ also relies on a series of other information, algorithms and data banks found in the following EU documents:
- EC Directive 97 / 48 / EC - EEC Directive 85 / 572 / EEC - Synoptic Document - provisional list of monomers and additives not defied to EU Commissions as substances which may be used in the manufacture of plastic intended to come into contact with foodstuffs. |
 |
 |
How many packaging layers can be simulated with MigraPass™? |
 The mathematical model given in the:
as well as the one used in MigraPass™ describes a one-dimensional migration process from a mono-layer homogenous plastic sample of constant thickness into a well-mixed liquid food or food simulant of finite volume.
For such a system, provided some specific initial and boundary conditions are fulfilled, the differential equation describing the migration process can be solved analytically and the amount of migration can be calculated with a relatively simple analytical algorithm.
The migration process from a multi-layer plastic food contact article into a food or food simulant is a much more complex process (especially when the multi-layer structure is made of a series of very different plastics!). The differential equation describing the migration process in such a case can be solved only with advanced numerical algorithms .
At the level of the EU Commission, the estimation, for compliance purposes, of migration from multi-layer plastic food contact article into a food or food simulant is an actual but not yet finalised topic. |
 |
 |
What are the standard (migration testing) conditions recommended by EU? |
|
 Issues with (experimental) migration testing conditions recommended by the EU Directives for compliance testing of plastic food contact materials must be answered case-by-case. That means that the petitioner must first know/define the real conditions (duration and temperature) under which the plastic food contact material is intended to be used in contact with a certain food. Based on this data the petitioner must then use the information and data banks given in the:
EC Directive 97 / 48 / EC
EEC Directive 85 / 572 / EEC
to find out the corresponding food simulant, migration time, t ,and temperature, T , to be used in a migration experiment.
For migration estimations using a user-friendly software, for example MigraPass™ developed by the FABES GmbH , the petitioner can use either the very same input data (recommended food simulant, migration time and temperature) as the ones derived for the migration experiment or the EU "worst case" contact conditions : 40°C during 10 days. |
 |
|